Law Essay Example about Muslim Faith - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2506 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Case study Did you like this example? A. Maria Haines has recently converted to the muslim faith and has now insisted on wearing the appropriate religious dress which requires Maria to wear clothing revealing only her eyes. Customers have refused to deal with her Maria is the sole Receptionist as BIS and they have told her that they will have to terminate her contract. If BIS decides to terminate Marias contract, then it is likely that she will commence proceeding against BIS for unfair dismissal, pursuant to section 94(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (as amended). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Law Essay Example about Muslim Faith" essay for you Create order It is likely that the primary basis for her claim will be that her right to freedom of religion, under Article 9 of the Human Rights Act 1998, has been infringed by her employers decision to dismiss her for wearing her religious head veil. Article 9(1) of this Act provides that, â€Å"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.† (Art. 9(1) HRA 1998) Maria will likely argue that in wearing a veil she is publically manifesting her religion in practice and observance. She may even try to rely upon the recent House of Lords decision in the case of R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 to support this argument. By virtue of section 98(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the burden of proof will rest upon BIS to satisfy the Tribunal, on the balance of probabilities, that the dismissal was not unfair. Maria may also argue that BIS has unlawfully discriminated against her on grounds of her religion and belief, in accordance with regulation 3 of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. Her argument would likely be that, in dismissing her, BIS treated her â€Å"less favourably than [it] treats or would treat other persons.† (Reg. 3(1)(a) EE(RoB)R 2003) There are several aspects to this claim which present opportunities for BIS to mount a successful defence to these claims: The first argument that BIS might make is that the dismissal in question was not unfair, because the reason for her dismissal â€Å"relates to [her] capability†¦ for performing work of the kind which [she] was employed by BIS to do.† (s.98(2)(a) ERA 1996) There is clear evidence here that Maria could not continue as receptionist, because BISs customers refused to have any further dealings with her, due to her insistence on covering her face with a religious veil. BIS can argue that Marias rights under Article 9(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 are not absolute because they are qualified by Article 9(2) of that same Act, which provides that, â€Å"Freedom to manifest ones religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.† (Art. 9(2) HRA 1998) BIS can argue that its right to run an effective business is one of the rights against which Article 9 must be weighed and that this latter right must prevail. There is recent and good judicial authority for this proposition; namely, in the case of Copsey v WWB Devon Clays Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 932 which applied the earlier case of Stedman v United Kingdom (1997) 23 E.H.R.R. CD 168. Mar ia might try to rebut this argument and distinguish these authorities on the basis that, in those cases, the employees in question refused to accept offers of alternative employment, although the success of this argument will depend upon whether or not it was viable for BIS to make such an offer in this case. In light of the fact that BIS is only a small company, it may well be the case that there did not, at the time of dismissal, exist any other vacancies for which Maria would have been suitably qualified. BIS might also try to argue, in light of the fact that Maria has only recently converted to Islam, that her religious beliefs are not sufficiently cogent, serious or important to warrant her reliance on Article 9 of the Human Rights Act 1998; while the success of this argument will fall on the Courts interpretation of the facts, there is judicial authority, at least at the European level, that lack of real or strong religious belief precludes the operation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 (Campbell and Cosans v United Kingdom (1982) 4 EHRR 293). A similar argument to this that BIS might try to rely upon is that Maria, in wearing a head veil, was not manifesting her religious beliefs, but was merely motivated to wear religious dress by those beliefs; again, there is judicial authority at the European level to support the validity of this argument (Arrowsmith v UK (1978) 3 EHRR 218). BIS can distinguish the decision handed down by the House of Lords in the case of R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 on the basis that this case concerned the treatment of a student in compulsory full-time education. Both Brooke LJ and Mummery LJ both explicitly declared in this case that the principles in operation were not the same as those applicable in the employment context (Sandberg, 2009:272). In regard to the argument that BISs dismissal constitutes discrimination under regulation 3 of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003: BIS can argue that, in light of the reaction of its customers to Marias head veil, requiring her to remove the veil during working hours became a genuine and proportionate occupational requirement, in accordance with regulation 7(2) of the 2003 Regulations (Nairns, 2007:93). In conclusion, so long as BIS can satisfy the Court that it was not in a position to be able to offer Maria any alternative employment, where she would have been able to continue wearing her religious dress, then it is highly unlikely that any of Marias claims will be successful. B. Josie Rimson has been employed in BIS cafeteria to prepare staff meats. She has noticed that some of the meats and sauces are out of date, but, having raised the issue, was told: â€Å"Your job is to make the meals, just get on with it†. She has now heard that some staff are off sick with suspected food poisoning and she is afraid she will be blamed. Repeated complaints to Senior Managers at BIS have been rejected so now she has reported the problem to Bramley Council. An item on the matter has now appeared in the Bramley Gazette. BIS has decided to discipline her, and have warned that she may be dismissed. The main issue here is whether or not a dismissal of Josie by BIS would be deemed unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996, as amended by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, an Act which inserted into the 1996 Act clause 103A, which provides that, â€Å"An employee who is dismissed shall be regarded for the purposes of this Part as unfairly dismissed if the reason (or, if more than one, the principal reason) for the dismissal is that the employee made a protected disclosure.† (s. 103A ERA 1996; s. 5 PIDA 1998) The term ‘protected disclosure is defined by sections 43A and 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (as amended) as, â€Å"†¦any disclosure of information which, in the reasonable belief of the worker making the disclosure, tends to show one or more of the following— (†¦) (b) that a person has failed, is failing or is likely to fail to comply with any legal obligation to which he is subject, (†¦) (d) that the health or safety of any individual has been, is being or is likely to be endangered (†¦) (f) that information tending to show any matter falling within any one of the preceding paragraphs has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed.† (s. 43A 43B ERA 1996) In the present case, it is reasonably clear, on the facts, that the reason Josie reported this matter to the Bramley Gazette was because she felt that her Senior Managers were trying to conceal or, at least, disregard the possibility that the instances of staff poisoning were the result of their consuming out of date food in the staff canteen, in which case section 43B(f) of the Employments Rights Act 1996 would likely be deemed satisfied. It may also be the case that Josie felt, in light of the despondence of BISs senior managers, that unless she reported this incident to the Bramley Gazette, the events giving rise to these incidences of food poisoning would repeat themselves in the future, in which case section 43B(d) of the Employments Rights Act 1996 would likely be deemed satisfied. If the Tribunal is satisfied (1) that Josie ‘reasonably believed that there had been malpractice on the part of her Senior Managers (Babula v Waltham Forest College [2007] EWCA Civ 174); and, (2) that Josies disclosure was the reason for her dismissal (Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380), then it is highly likely that Josie will be able to bring a successful claim against BIS for unfair dismissal. BIS might try to argue that Josie is being dismissed for gross negligence, in preparing staff meals using foods which were out of date , and that when the Senior Managers told her â€Å"Your job is to make the meals, just get on with it,† they were merely reminding her that it is within her job capacity to make decisions in regard to which food stuffs to use and which to discard. While this argument might have had some merit if Josies Senior Managers had commenced disciplinary proceedings afte r Josie admitted that the recent outbreak of food poisoning was potentially attributable to her having served out of date food stuffs in the staff canteen, the fact that such proceedings were only initiated after the article was published in the Bramley Gazette, renders this version of events highly improbable. C. Harriet Jameson has recently returned from sick leave following a serious car accident, which required her to have extensive surgery for major facial injuries. The surgery left her with very visible red scarring on her face. BIS has interviewed her and suggested removing her from her post as Manager of the company creche because the children of the employees have refused to attend: they have been having nightmares, and this is affecting attendance of the female employees at work. Harriet has refused her relocation to the personnel Department, claiming discrimination. The main issue which falls for determination here is whether or not Harriet, if dismissed from her position as Manager of the company crà ¨che, will be able to mount a successful claim against BIS for unfair dismissal. We have been told that Harriet is claiming that she is being discriminated against on the basis of her facial disfigurement. However, in order for this argument to have legal validity, it is necessary that Harriet can satisfy the Tribunal that her facial scarring qualifies her for protection under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. For the purposes of this Act, a ‘person with disability is defined as follows: â€Å"†¦ a person has a disability for the purposes of this Act if he has a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.† (s. 1(1) DDA 1995) While there is no doubt that Harriets purported disability is physical in nature, in order for her to argue that it is a qualifying impairment, she must satisfy the Tribunal that it is having substantial adverse effects, that those substantial adverse effects will likely remain for the long-term and that they affect her ability to carry out normal day-to-day functions or activities (Department for Work and Pensions, 2005:3). The Guidance issued by the Secretary of State on the definition of disability, pursuant to section 3 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 confirms that, with some limited exceptions (e.g. for self-inflicted scarring, piercing or tattoos), bodily scarring or disfigurement will be deemed to have substantial adverse effects on a persons ability to undertake normal day-to-day activities (Department for Work and Pensions, 2005:6; Adams, 2008:375). To satisfy the ‘long-term criterion of the 1995 Act, the scarring must either have been present for 12 months or be likely to remain for that period (Adams, 2008:375). In this present case, while the s urgery was only recent, it seems likely, due to its severity, that the scarring will remain for at least this length of time. Having established that Harriet qualified for protection under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, it is now necessary to consider whether or not she has been discriminated against on the basis of her disability. ‘Discrimination is defined by section 5 of the 1995 Act: â€Å"For the purposes of this Part, an employer discriminates against a disabled person if— (a) for a reason which relates to the disabled persons disability, he treats him less favourably than he treats or would treat others to whom that reason does not or would not apply; and (b) he cannot show that the treatment in question is justified.† (s. 5(1) DDA 1995). While it is certainly the case that BIS has asked Harriet to accept a lateral move on the basis of her disability, BIS will seek to show that this did not constitute discrimination because it was not approp riate for her to remain working with children, in light of the effect that her disfigurement has had on them, in practice. In the opinion of this author, BIS has acted reasonably and proportionately in asking Harriet to relinquish her role as Manager of the company crà ¨che and to accept an alternative employment position in the company. As Adams (2008:367) argues, albeit in a slightly different context, â€Å"An employer†¦ may be justified in refusing to employ as a model for cosmetics someone who suffers from a disfiguring scarring†¦Ã¢â‚¬  In conclusion, if Harriet refuses to accept BISs offer of alternative employment, BIS will be entitled to terminate her contract, without fear of any legal repercussions under the Employment Rights Act 1996 or the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. References/ Bibliography The Employment Rights Act 1996. The Employment Rights Act 2002. The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. Stedman v United Kingdom (1997) 23 E.H.R.R. CD 168. The Human Rights Act 1998. Copsey v WWB Devon Clays Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 932. The European Convention on Human Rights 1950. Campbell and Cosans v United Kingdom (1982) 4 EHRR 293. Arrowsmith v UK (1978) 3 EHRR 218. R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15. Sandberg, R., 2009. The Changing Position of Religious Minorities in English Law: The Legacy of Begum. In RD Grillo (ed.), Legal Practice and Cultural Diversity, Ch. 14. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Nairns, J., 2007. Employment law for business students. 3rd edition. London: Pearson Education Publishing. The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Babula v Waltham Forest College [2007] EWCA Civ 174. The Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380. Department for Work and Pensions, 2005. Disability Discrimination Act consultation document: guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability. London: The Stationary Office. Adams, A., (2008). Law for business students. 5th edition. London: Pearson Education Publishing.

Essay about Descartes First Meditation - 924 Words

Descartes#8217; first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion. The purpose of Descartes#8217; evil demon argument is to†¦show more content†¦Therefore meaning that the world that we live in, the external world, is non-existent and merely a mirage placed into our minds by an evil demon. Obviously, to any sane person, this would sound irrational, but this is the p ossible world that Descartes presents to establish doubt in his common beliefs, mainly his belief that there exists an external world. One of the questions that needs to be raised when discussing Descartes#8217; first meditation and his skeptical arguments is; is it possible to completely separate one#8217;s self from all their current beliefs? For this is what Descartes sets out to do in the first meditation. This question is highly relevant in terms of Descartes evil demon argument, for it appears no matter what, he is not able to separate himself from his belief in God. Descartes#8217; argument is not that the evil demon is replacing God, which would seem to be the logical view. Instead, Descartes says that the evil demon is coexisting with God. Therefore, even though Descartes claims to be starting at ground zero and proceeding to prove that his common beliefs are true, he never actually denies the existence of God. In the later meditations, he reveals his belief in innate ideas and the existence of God is one of them. Yet as far as Descartes evil demon argument is concerned, the fact that he maintains this belief in God throughoutShow MoreRelatedDescartes Meditations On First Philosophy1318 Words   |  6 PagesPhilosophical Questions November 2, 2017 Cogito Ergo Sum Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and his questioning of our existence in reality is a question which philosophers have tackled throughout time. Cogito ergo sum or I think therefore I am, a phrase brought about by Descartes is the backbone of his whole philosophy of our existence in reality. As long as we are thinking things, we exist. When we look at this approach to our existence we must first deny that any sensory data that we receive is believableRead MoreDescartes First Meditation Essay1328 Words   |  6 PagesDescartes First Meditation Rene Descartes decision to shatter the molds of traditional thinking is still talked about today. He is regarded as an influential abstract thinker; and some of his main ideas are still talked about by philosophers all over the world. While he wrote the Meditations, he secluded himself from the outside world for a length of time, basically tore up his conventional thinking; and tried to come to some conclusion as to what was actually true and existing. In orderRead MoreDescartes Meditations On First Philosophy1961 Words   |  8 PagesIn Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, I will be considering if Descartes resolution to the â€Å"dreaming argument† seems acceptable to trust. The First Meditation is where the â€Å"dreaming argument† is first mentioned and then gets resolved later in the Sixth Meditation and the Objections and Replies. I will be touching on the idea that our experiences could be dreaming experiences based on personal experiences and thoughts I have had regarding this topic. Then I will go on to explain how it isRead MoreAn Analysis of Descartes’ First Meditation Essay example1448 Words   |  6 Pages13th, 2012 An Analysis of Descartes’ First Meditation In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon â€Å"or evil genius†. Descartes’ dream argument argues thatRead MoreEssay on Rene Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy2121 Words   |  9 Pages  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Descartes believes that knowledge comes from within the mind. This is a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes writes his Six Meditations. In these meditations, Descartes tries to develop a strong foundation, which all knowledge can be built upon. In the First Meditation, Descartes begins developing this foundation throu gh the method of doubt. He casts doubt upon all his previous beliefs, including â€Å"mattersRead MoreDescartes First Three Meditations And Explain How Descartes Discovers The Foundation Of Knowledge1503 Words   |  7 Pageswill go over Descartes’ first three meditations and explain how Descartes discovers the foundation of knowledge, I will go over his problems with sensory knowledge, I will evaluate his claims, and I will present my objection to them. Descartes is very well known as the father of skepticism, which is very ironic, considering his main goal was to make a fool proof reason to believe in the existence of God. He wanted to make a case so strong, that if any atheist were to read his meditations, they wouldRead MoreBeliefs Beyond Doubt, What All Other Respond To: Rene Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy1998 Words   |  8 PagesRene Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works in modern philosophy. John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and countless other philosophers wrote largely in response to Descartes. Yet there are serious doubts related to the treatises major argument. In the Objections and Replies, a collection of objections to the work along with Descartes personal and often very detailed replies to said objections, the philosopher Antoine Arnauld raises the question of whetherRead MoreDescartes First Meditation2099 Words   |  9 PagesDescartes First Meditation Descartes believes that knowledge comes from within the mind, a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes writes his Six Meditations. In these meditations, Descartes tries to develop a strong foundation, which all knowledge can be built upon. In the First Meditation, Descartes begins developing this foundation through the method of doubt. He casts doubt upon all his previous beliefsRead MoreDescartes Meditations On First Philosophy807 Words   |  4 PagesConner Ruhl Professor Copley Philosophy 1000C 4 May 2015 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes was the first great philosopher of the modern era, He had a new approach which was focused on scientific and mathematical truths. Descartes came to reject the scholastic tradition, one of which he was educated, due to his pursuit of mathematical and scientific truth. Much of Descartes work was done to secure advancement of human knowledge through the use of the natural sciencesRead MoreDescartes Meditations On First Philosophy1079 Words   |  5 PagesThroughout Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes argues for the ideas and philosophical beliefs behind skepticism. In his writings, he describes the fallibility and importance of the body of man and through extension the senses with which we observe the world. This paper will first show that within Descartes’ writings the body is an extension of the mind. Secondly, this paper will prove that the senses are a false form of understanding which leads to the deception of the mind. Finally

Grading Machines free essay sample

There has been a push to evaluate English essays through online grading machines recently. Teachers would virtually have no role in judging student writing and only need to submit the essays to the site. The process is quite meaningless; the site would scan for plagiarism, check the writing formulas, and ensure that the structure is precise. Therefore, the process would be entirely based on the structure  ­essentially without any focus on the actual content. As long as the grammar and vocabulary are correct, the student would receive a stellar grade. If grading machines were introduced, it would make writing essays much easier and save students a lot of time. However, such an innovation would be a major setback and an atrocity for our literary future. The unique style of each student would disappear once online grading sites are instituted. Since the essays would be based purely on structure, the desire to articulate thoughtful and profound content will inevitably fade. We will write a custom essay sample on Grading Machines or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page  ­Essays will not represent the students voice; instead they will essentially become simple mathematical equations. The inner core of true literature, an expression of the soul and innate creativity, would soon be forgotten. Writing devices would become vestigial. Why write a complex simile or metaphor when a simple sentence would suffice? Though essays based on a formula would make English class decisively easier, they would be detrimental to the students inner growth and reflection. The true purpose of writing is to form personal  ­perspectives and personal identity. Such values must not be collectivized and disregarded. Once the formula becomes the most important part of an essay, each will sound same as the next. Furthermore, essentially every subject is objective; math problems each have one answer, history has one story, and science has one solution. However, English takes on many forms with its many styles. People can view a story based on their own interpretation. In literature, you can say that 2+2=5 and that 1 is infinite. Grand possibilities only exist through writing, in which there is no defined right answer, but instead an opportunity to create something that is truly unique and phenomenal. Scholars do not study great writers like Shakespeare for his formula of a play. They do not care the most about his structure of a love story. Instead, they care about how the story is presented, the emotions of the characters, and the creativity of the story. Leo Tolstoys War and Peace is not a classic because its formulaic. George Orwells Animal Farm has not achieved notoriety for being simple or straightforward. True classics are assembled with marvelous artistry, which online sites would cause to die. A successful movement to install grading machines would be a detrimental move toward uniformity. Great literature thrives on creative, progressive, and convoluted thoughts. Simply grading based on structure would destroy writing and make it truly objective. Literature without creativity is like a painting with no color or flamboyance; it loses its meaning, its dramatic nature, everything. To protect the sanctity of writing, these corrupt grading machines must be abandoned. The future of literature depends on it. If these ghastly machines become popular, the entire world will become one cliche.

This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Example Essay Example

This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Example Paper This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Introduction Romeo and Juliet, perhaps the most famous love story of all times tells the tale two lovers, children of enemies who have been fighting for years whose love ends up in a tragedy. Issues rose within Romeo and Juliet are very much relevant today as it deals with affairs of love, hatred and violence. This novel has inspired an innumerable amount of plays, musicals, films, paintings etc, and continues to inspire many more. We have studied two versions of the film, the Franco Zeffirelli version (1968) which contains a setting back in time into the Elizabethan era, with the Elizabethan style clothes and houses, and the Baz Luhrman version (1997) which contains a more modern setting, with modern clothes and houses, but also with a futuristic feel. Act 3, scene 5 is a key scene due to it being the middle of the play in which the audience would expect a high impact scene with a huge turning point of the story line and of the characters. This scene contains a multitude of emotions, from the lo ve and harmony to the drama and desperation. The scene is very powerfully filled with high tension and lots of action and it is this immense dramaticy which has a significant impact on the audience. It reveals to the audience a lot about the morals and values of the characters; Juliet changes completely in this scene. No longer do we see the sweet, naive, obedient girl who respects and obeys her parents, we perceive a strong, tough young woman who has alienated herself from the only adults she knew and is willing to die than obey them. This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Body Paragraphs The scene begins with the morning after Romeo and Juliet have spent their one and only night together; their marriage consummated and the audience very conscious of this act. The atmosphere is calm and tranquil, very amorous and romantic though with a sense of sorrow. Both films have expressed this with tranquil, serene music playing softly in order to enhance the atmosphere. The lovers passionately speak to each other, Juliet does not wish for Romeo to leave, â€Å"Will though be gone? It is not yet near the day†. Romeo’s reply, â€Å"Night’s candles are burnt out, and jocund the day†, is very imagistic and poetic. Juliet strongly wishes for Romeo to stay as she knows that the day will bring Romeo’s departure, â€Å"And light thee on thy way to Mantua†. Romeo plays with the words, â€Å"Come, death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so†, though this is ominous and ironic as the audience are aware that this will be their fate. A contrast be tween light and dark is seen as the play so far has associated light with lust, fighting, anger and it is the night in which they can be together and love one another. In the films, the lovers play almost childishly together under the white bed sheets, white emphasizing their innocence and how playful they are. They are in their own world, totally remote from the rest of the fighting, violence and bloodshed. Juliet poeticises to Romeo, â€Å"Love, lord, ay husband, friend† revealing the extent of Romeo to Juliet ,he is her lover, lord, husband and friend. The audience feel sympathetic towards these two lovers, even more sorrow as learn from the previous scene Capulet had already arranged the marriage between Juliet and Paris, an effective use of dramatic irony. As the two lovers depart Juliet cries, â€Å"O think’st thou we shall ever meet again?†, a line so poignant and emotional as we know that they shall never meet again. Then as Romeo departs, and Juliet loo ks down on Romeo as sees him â€Å"As one dead in the bottom of a tomb†. The sense of foreboding and dread comes into being. It is a reminder that these two lovers are star-crossed lovers, and that they are ill fated as told in the prologue. An Elizabethan audience would have appreciated this idea of fate and destiny, and how their lives were mapped-out by the stars, as this too was their belief. Juliet weeps due to the leaving of Romeo. Lady Capulet enters the room and believes these tears are for the loss of Tybalt. Again, irony is used as the audience know that Juliet’s grief is for Romeo. Her talk as the audience would known is the grieving of Romeos departure She also plays with the words as she speaks to her mother, â€Å"Ay madam, from the reach of these my hands†. Her reaching of hands is to hold Romeo, while her mother would imagine it is to strangle and kill him. Juliet ambiguously cries, â€Å"With Romeo, till I behold him – dead – Is m y poor heart.†. Though we known that Juliet is exclaiming, â€Å"With Romeo till I behold him, dead is my poor heart† her mother interprets it as, â€Å"With Romeo till I behold him dead†. Juliet clearly intends to deceive her mother. This intensely builds tension as the truth could transpire. We notice how calm and mature Juliet is in facing her mother and how much she has changed from the sweet girl we met at the beginning of this play. But the news from Lady Capulet of Juliet to â€Å"marry. early next Thursday morn. shall happily make thee there a joyful bride† is the beginning of cataclysm within this scene. The shock and despondency of this news is clearly stated within her dialogue, â€Å"Now, by Saint Peter’s Church and Peter too, he shall not make me there a joyful bride†. The repetition of her mothers words emphasise the rhythm of the dialogue and reflects her defiance and loyalty to Romeo. She cannot go through with this marriage a s she has wedded married Romeo and consummated it. An Elizabethan audience would recognise this and understand how Juliet felt, as to get married again would be breaking a law of God. The audience would be fully drawn into her dilemma and the atmosphere would be very tense. But Lady Capulet steps back and lets her husband deal with the matter. Capulet enters with most joy and bliss due to the arrangement he has just set. He talks with softness conveying he can be loving and sweet, but he also refers to Juliet as, â€Å"In one little body.†. This reveals to us what he sees his own daughter as, something in â€Å"one little body†, a passion in which you control. In Elizabethan time women had no status. Neither eminence nor equal rights were a part of their culture. Their general image was of being the man’s property and respect was only gained through marriage or a male representative. When the news is broken to Capulet, he is shocked. â€Å"How? Will she none? D oth she not gives us thanks? Is she not proud? Doth she not count her bless†. His surprised reaction is shown in the questioning of this news; his use of repetition, repeating the word â€Å"Doth† as in â€Å"Doesn’t she?† increases the pace and the use short sentences to emphasise onto his shock. His anger increases as he starts to rant and rave. â€Å"How, how, how, how?†. Capulet sees this issue of disobedience from his daughter as â€Å"chopped logic†, something that is illogical and unfounded, again reflecting Elizabethan culture. His language turns abusive and insulting which is more horrifying than the actual physical abuse! â€Å"Mistress minion you. you green-sickness carrion!. you baggage! You tallow-face†. Even the sounds and alliteration in â€Å"mistress minion† reflect his contempt and anger. In the two films, Capulet anger is defied visually as he uses physical abuse on his daughter; but this is not in the actual play. He mentions â€Å"my fingers itch† but does not actually hit Juliet. The reason the films have used this visual abuse is to appeal more to a modern day audience. People today are uninterested in plain, ordinary language and need this action to keep them involved. The films also use a fast moving camera, with different camera angles, close-ups, dramatic music which all heighten the tension, anticipation and pace. We also see the true Capulet here. He seems to be a man who is used to having their way, and a result of the opposite would turn him very violent. The audience also would realise that the arranged marriage for Juliet is more of an opportunity for him to do his fatherly duty and send his daughter of into another family, rather than for her own happiness. He is shown to be caring and concerned for his daughter, but can turn rude, violent and aggressive if he is disobeyed. The words, ‘And you be not, hang, beg starve, die in the streets† reveal jut how shard-hearted and selfish Capulet is, all we have learned of this man from within this scene. However, Juliet’s response towards her fathers insulting language, â€Å"Good father, I beseech you on my knees. Hear me with patience but to speak a word†, is polite and respective, reflecting a child who does not wish to disobey her parents. But there is nothing she can do when her father gives her the ultimatum, â€Å"fettle your fine joints ‘gainst Thursday next. or I will drag thee on a hurdle†. Again, note the language used by Capulet, â€Å"fettle your fine joints† which mirror his image of Juliet as a fragile, brittle girl and the use of fricative sounds within emphasizing his disdain. Now that Juliet has been disowned by her father, she turns to the only people she can turn to. She cries to her mother but her reply is of no help or comfort at all, â€Å"Do as thou wilt, for I have done with thee.† Her own mother turns her back on Juliet and rejects her. We are shown the true relationship between Juliet and her mother. Again in Elizabethan times children were commonly brought up by nurses, which brought about a weak bond between mother and child with neither no love nor care. Juliet turns to the nurse, the only person now she can turn to. She pleads to the nurse, â€Å"O God, O Nurse, how shall this be prevented. Comfort me, counsel me. But the response is not of what Juliet expects, â€Å"I think it is best of you married with the County. O, he’s a lovely gentleman. Romeo’s a dishclout to him.† The shock and distress Juliet must have felt when she heard this. Though the nurse well-intentioned in trying to comfort and please her mistress, she has failed to recognise how much Juliet had changed and how much she had undermined Juliet’s true character and feelings. This marks the severing of Juliet’s esteem and friendship for her nurse; Juliet quite furiously calls her a â€Å"O most wi cked fiend†. Now Juliet has been abandoned and betrayed by the only adults she new and trusted. She now feels isolated, lonely and desperate. But Juliet throughout this scene has strengthened herself mentally becoming a committed, independent woman which allows her take control over this predicament. She plans to go see Friar Lawrence, her last chance of help, â€Å"I’ll tell the Friar to know his remedy. If all else fail, I myself have power to die†. Juliet, directly speaking to the audience, informs them that if her final plan fails her last course of action will be left to her to kill herself. Again we are indicated of the coming tragedy. As mentioned earlier on Act 3 Scene 5 is a vital scene of the play. It combines emotions of harmony and love through to the violence, brutality and desperation. It is a turning point of the play, from a romantic story through to a tragedy. It also is a turning point of Juliet, in which she becomes a strong, independent woman who is willing to kill herself rather than obey her father’s rules which undermine her religious values. It contains an insight of the other characters, including the bully of a father and the shallowness of a nurse. It consists of irony, drama, effective dialogue and excellent use of language. In my opinion, Shakespeare has been very successful of having the dramatic impact intended on the audience. We will write a custom essay sample on This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on This assignment is an analysis of the dramatic impact of Romeo and Juliet, Act 3, scene 5 Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer